Comments for Rinke Hoekstra http://www.leibnizcenter.org/users/rinke "Time is nature's way to keep everything from happening at once." - John Wheeler Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:32:58 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 Comment on Knowledge Representation in the Legal Domain by The Semantic Puzzle | What’s hot in the Semantic Wiki Community? http://www.leibnizcenter.org/users/rinke/2007/12/10/knowledge-representation-in-the-legal-domain/#comment-2487 The Semantic Puzzle | What’s hot in the Semantic Wiki Community? Mon, 20 Oct 2008 08:38:45 +0000 http://www.leibnizcenter.org/users/rinke/2007/12/10/knowledge-representation-in-the-legal-domain/#comment-2487 [...] Knowledge Representation in the Legal Domain [...] [...] Knowledge Representation in the Legal Domain [...]

]]> Comment on ExtractMyDMS: Extracting files from eGroupware MyDMS by hoekstra http://www.leibnizcenter.org/users/rinke/2007/03/09/extractmydms-extracting-files-from-e-groupware-mydms/#comment-1668 hoekstra Fri, 14 Sep 2007 11:15:07 +0000 http://www.leibnizcenter.org/users/rinke/2007/03/09/extractmydms-extracting-files-from-e-groupware-mydms/#comment-1668 Cool, glad it is of some use! Cool, glad it is of some use!

]]> Comment on ExtractMyDMS: Extracting files from eGroupware MyDMS by Erwin http://www.leibnizcenter.org/users/rinke/2007/03/09/extractmydms-extracting-files-from-e-groupware-mydms/#comment-1621 Erwin Mon, 27 Aug 2007 14:55:46 +0000 http://www.leibnizcenter.org/users/rinke/2007/03/09/extractmydms-extracting-files-from-e-groupware-mydms/#comment-1621 Thx, for this script. Modified it to be usable for the latest version of mydms. Also modifying the bit if the file already exists. Now it leaves the first file from being overwritten. However in such cases you would want the latest version instead of the first Will keep you posted. Thx for the bit until now. saved me a great amount of work Thx, for this script.
Modified it to be usable for the latest version of mydms. Also modifying the bit if the file already exists. Now it leaves the first file from being overwritten. However in such cases you would want the latest version instead of the first

Will keep you posted. Thx for the bit until now. saved me a great amount of work

]]> Comment on ExtractMyDMS: Extracting files from eGroupware MyDMS by hoekstra http://www.leibnizcenter.org/users/rinke/2007/03/09/extractmydms-extracting-files-from-e-groupware-mydms/#comment-1370 hoekstra Thu, 02 Aug 2007 14:58:00 +0000 http://www.leibnizcenter.org/users/rinke/2007/03/09/extractmydms-extracting-files-from-e-groupware-mydms/#comment-1370 Thanks very much for pointing this out! I have corrected the access restrictions, and it should work now. Thanks very much for pointing this out! I have corrected the access restrictions, and it should work now.

]]> Comment on ExtractMyDMS: Extracting files from eGroupware MyDMS by Pierluigi Del Nostro http://www.leibnizcenter.org/users/rinke/2007/03/09/extractmydms-extracting-files-from-e-groupware-mydms/#comment-1369 Pierluigi Del Nostro Thu, 02 Aug 2007 14:48:20 +0000 http://www.leibnizcenter.org/users/rinke/2007/03/09/extractmydms-extracting-files-from-e-groupware-mydms/#comment-1369 Hi Rinke, i've tried to download the script but no way. Is the link broken? Thanks for developing that script that can be very usefull Hi Rinke,
i’ve tried to download the script but no way.
Is the link broken?

Thanks for developing that script that can be very usefull

]]> Comment on Verkiezingen… by ML http://www.leibnizcenter.org/users/rinke/2006/10/27/in-het-kader-van-de-komende-verkiezingen/#comment-60 ML Tue, 07 Nov 2006 09:06:02 +0000 http://www.leibnizcenter.org/users/rinke/2006/10/27/in-het-kader-van-de-komende-verkiezingen/#comment-60 I don't mean to impose on you, but I'd appreciate a translation. ;) I don’t mean to impose on you, but I’d appreciate a translation. ;)

]]> Comment on Ontology versions: just a thought… (and a script) by Kasper http://www.leibnizcenter.org/users/rinke/2006/08/10/ontology-versions-just-a-thought/#comment-5 Kasper Thu, 10 Aug 2006 11:47:37 +0000 http://www.leibnizcenter.org/users/rinke/2006/08/10/ontology-versions-just-a-thought/#comment-5 I like the idea of using a specialised diff and merge for version management of OWL documents. Since some editors have a tendency to serialise the document differently each time. A problem with the OWL diff of Denny Vrandecic is that it only returns the axioms missing in the other ontology. In the context of version management it only returns your local additions. OWL diff does not return axioms others added to the repository nor axioms your deleted. A solution/hack might be to run OWL diff twice and combine the results. I like the idea of using a specialised diff and merge for version management of OWL documents. Since some editors have a tendency to serialise the document differently each time.

A problem with the OWL diff of Denny Vrandecic is that it only returns the axioms missing in the other ontology. In the context of version management it only returns your local additions. OWL diff does not return axioms others added to the repository nor axioms your deleted.

A solution/hack might be to run OWL diff twice and combine the results.

]]> Comment on OWL Tools by Rinke Hoekstra » Ontology versions: just a thought… http://www.leibnizcenter.org/users/rinke/2006/08/10/owl-tools/#comment-4 Rinke Hoekstra » Ontology versions: just a thought… Thu, 10 Aug 2006 08:13:46 +0000 http://www.leibnizcenter.org/users/rinke/2006/08/10/owl-tools/#comment-4 [...] A couple of weeks ago I found out that the TortoiseSVN Subversion client GUI for Windows is able to use Microsoft Word for performing diffs and merges on Word documents. While composing today’s post on the OWL Tools of Denny Vrandecic, something went ‘click’: why not use his diff and merge algorithms for resolving conflincts between different versions of an ontology stored using Subversion? The SVN book says the following: Subversion uses its internal diff engine, which produces unified diff format, by default. If you want diff output in a different format, specify an external diff program using --diff-cmd and pass any flags you’d like to it using the --extensions switch. For example, to see local differences in file foo.c in context output format while ignoring whitespace changes, you might run svn diff –diff-cmd /usr/bin/diff –extensions ‘-bc’ foo.c. [...] [...] A couple of weeks ago I found out that the TortoiseSVN Subversion client GUI for Windows is able to use Microsoft Word for performing diffs and merges on Word documents. While composing today’s post on the OWL Tools of Denny Vrandecic, something went ‘click’: why not use his diff and merge algorithms for resolving conflincts between different versions of an ontology stored using Subversion? The SVN book says the following: Subversion uses its internal diff engine, which produces unified diff format, by default. If you want diff output in a different format, specify an external diff program using –diff-cmd and pass any flags you’d like to it using the –extensions switch. For example, to see local differences in file foo.c in context output format while ignoring whitespace changes, you might run svn diff –diff-cmd /usr/bin/diff –extensions ‘-bc’ foo.c. [...]

]]> Comment on OWL and Identity by Rinke Hoekstra » OWL 1.1: the next level http://www.leibnizcenter.org/users/rinke/2006/07/31/owl-and-identity/#comment-3 Rinke Hoekstra » OWL 1.1: the next level Mon, 31 Jul 2006 21:36:44 +0000 http://www.leibnizcenter.org/users/rinke/2006/07/31/owl-and-identity/#comment-3 [...] The past couple of weeks I have been rather busy writing an article (together with Jochem Liem) about my experiences in using OWL-DL for my PhD research (automatic liability attribution). While doing this I couldn’t help but notice some of the recent developments in the OWL community, and most notably the proposed improvements to OWL: OWL 1.1 provides extra Description Logic expressive power, moving from the SHOIN Description Logic that underlies OWL DL to the SROIQ Description Logic. The additions are: [...] [...] The past couple of weeks I have been rather busy writing an article (together with Jochem Liem) about my experiences in using OWL-DL for my PhD research (automatic liability attribution). While doing this I couldn’t help but notice some of the recent developments in the OWL community, and most notably the proposed improvements to OWL: OWL 1.1 provides extra Description Logic expressive power, moving from the SHOIN Description Logic that underlies OWL DL to the SROIQ Description Logic. The additions are: [...]

]]> Comment on OWL 1.1: the next level by Rinke Hoekstra » OWL and Identity http://www.leibnizcenter.org/users/rinke/2006/07/31/owl-11-the-next-level/#comment-2 Rinke Hoekstra » OWL and Identity Mon, 31 Jul 2006 21:30:25 +0000 http://www.leibnizcenter.org/users/rinke/2006/07/31/owl-11-the-next-level/#comment-2 [...] Possible followup: the OWL 1.1 proposal does not solve this issue… [...] [...] Possible followup: the OWL 1.1 proposal does not solve this issue… [...]

]]>